Skip to content
Advertisements

Posts from the ‘Centrify’ Category

The Current State Of Cybersecurity Shows Now Is The Time For Zero Trust

  • 41% of total breaches in 2017 targeted the healthcare industry, making it the most popular target for breach attempts.
  • Personally Identifiable Information (PII) combined with user credentials tops the percentage of breaches with 29% according to Wipro’s report.
  • 88 records were lost or stolen every second in 2017 according to Wipro’s analysis.
  • Machine learning & AI are the second highest ranking security competencies for the future.

These and many other fascinating findings are from Wipro’s State of Cybersecurity Report 2018. A copy of the report can be downloaded here (PDF, 96 pp., no opt-in). The study is based on four primary sources of data including primary research of Wipro customers, Cyber Defense Center (CDC) primary research, secondary research sources and Wipro partner content. 42% of respondents are from North America, 10% from Europe, 18% from the Middle East, 21% from Asia and 8% from Australia. For additional details on the methodology, please see pages 3 through 5 of the report.

Banking & Financial Services and Healthcare Breaches Most Common

Over 40% of all breaches Wipro was able to track using their CDCs are targeted at healthcare, followed by banking & financial services with 18%. This is consistent with Verizon’s 2018 Data Breach Investigations Report which shows healthcare leading all industries with five times the number of breaches experienced than any other industry. Banking & financial services receive more server-based breach incidents than any other industry according to Verizon’s latest study. Accenture’s study, “Losing the Cyber Culture War in Healthcare: Accenture 2018 Healthcare Workforce Survey on Cybersecurity” found that 18% of healthcare employees are willing to sell confidential data to unauthorized parties for as little as $500 to $1,000.

Wipro’s State of Cybersecurity Report 2018 underscores how all industries are facing a security crisis today. The study shows how all industries need a more scalable approach to security that protects every attack surface by validating every access request on every device, for every resource.  Zero Trust Security (ZTS) continues to be proven effective in thwarting breach attempts across all industries by relying on its four core pillars of verifying the identity of every user, validating every device, limiting access and privilege, as well as relying on machine learning to analyze user behavior and gain greater insights from analytics. Leaders in this field include Centrify for Privileged Access Management, Idaptive, (a new company soon to be spun out from Centrify) for Next-Gen Access, as well as CiscoF5 and Palo Alto Networks in networking.

ZTS starts by maturing an organization’s identity management practices ― be it to secure end-user access credentials through Next-Gen Access (NGA) or to secure privileged user credentials via Zero Trust Privilege (ZTP). NGA empowers organizations to validate every end user access attempt by capturing and then analyzing a wide breadth of data, including user identity, device, device operating system, location, time, resource request, and many other factors to derive risk scores. NGA determines in less than a second if verified end users will get immediate access to resources requested, or be asked to verify their identity further through Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA). Zero Trust Privilege is focused on privileged users that typically hold the “keys to the kingdom” and therefore are a common target for cyber adversaries. ZTP grants least privilege access based on verifying who is requesting access, the context of the request, and the risk of the access environment. By implementing least privilege access, organizations minimize attack surfaces, improving audit and compliance visibility, and reducing risk, complexity, and costs for the modern, hybrid enterprise. Every industry needs Zero Trust Security to secure the proliferating number and variety of attack surfaces and realize that each customer, employee and partner identity is their real security perimeter.

Key takeaways of the Wipro State of Cybersecurity Report 2018 include the following:

  • Security Architecture & Design and Machine learning & AI are the #1 and #2 ranked security competencies for the future. When senior executive respondents were asked which security competencies would most help security practitioners excel in the cybersecurity domain, they mentioned security architecture & design (31%) and machine learning & AI (19%) as their top choices. Next-Gen Access platforms leverage machine learning algorithms to continuously learn and generate contextual intelligence that is used to streamline access for verified end users while thwarting breach attempts, the most common of which is compromised credentials. Please click on the graphic to expand it for easier reading.

  • 29% of respondents say that Privileged Access Management (PAM) gave them most value, further validating now is the time for Zero Trust Privilege. IT executives are more and more understanding that privileged access credential abuse is the most common cause for cyber-attacks and therefore are starting to place more emphasis on implementing Privileged Access Management. Centrify has recently announced a new focus on Zero Trust Privilege, extending PAM to a broader modern threatscape including DevOps, containers, Big Data and more. Please click on the graphic to expand it for easier reading.

  • Endpoint attack vectors are proliferating faster than traditional enterprise security approaches can keep up. The scale and scope of endpoint attack vectors continue to change quickly. Wipro found that breach attempts are often multi-dimensional with orchestrated attempts to compromise a combination of attack vectors at once. Wipro’s findings that endpoint attack vectors are fluctuating so quickly further support the need for ZTS enabled by Next-Gen Access as the primary security strategy to thwart breach attempts. Please click on the graphic to expand it for easier reading.

Conclusion

In quantifying the number and scope of breaches healthcare, banking & financial services, retail, education and manufacturing companies experienced in 2017, Wipro’s latest Wipro State of Cybersecurity Report shows how every identity is the new security perimeter of a business. Attack surfaces are proliferating with the growth of business models in each of these industries, accelerated by the Internet of Things (IoT) adoption and smart, connected products and systems. By relying on the four core pillars of verifying the identity of every user, validating every device, limiting access and privilege, as well as relying on machine learning to analyze user behavior and gain greater insights from analytics, Zero Trust Security thwarts breach attempts by protecting every threat surface in real-time.

Advertisements

IBM’s 2018 Data Breach Study Shows Why We’re In A Zero Trust World Now

  • Digital businesses that lost less than 1% of their customers due to a data breach incurred a cost of $2.8M, and if 4% or more were lost the cost soared to $6M.
  • U.S. based breaches are the most expensive globally, costing on average $7.91M with the highest global notification cost as well, $740,000.
  • A typical data breach costs a company $3.86M, up 6.4% from $3.62M last year.
  • Digital businesses that have security automation can minimize the costs of breaches by $1.55M versus those businesses who are not ($2.88M versus $4.43M).
  • 48% of all breaches are initiated by malicious or criminal attacks.
  • Mean-time-to-identify (MTTI) a breach is 197 days, and the mean-time-to-contain (MTTC) is 69 days.

These and many other insights into the escalating costs of security breaches are from the 2018 Cost of a Data Breach Study sponsored by IBM Security with research independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC. The report is downloadable here (PDF, 47 pp. no opt-in).

The study is based on interviews with more than 2,200 compliance, data protection and IT professionals from 477 companies located in 15 countries and regions globally who have experienced a data breach in the last 12 months. This is the first year the use of Internet of Things (IoT) technologies and security automation are included in the study. The study also defines mega breaches as those involving over 1 million records and costing $40M or more. Please see pages 5, 6 and 7 of the study for specifics on the methodology.

The report is a quick read and the data provided is fascinating. One can’t help but reflect on how legacy security technologies designed to protect digital businesses decades ago isn’t keeping up with the scale, speed and sophistication of today’s breach attempts. The most common threat surface attacked is compromised privileged credential access. 81% of all breaches exploit identity according to an excellent study from Centrify and Dow Jones Customer Intelligence, CEO Disconnect is Weakening Cybersecurity (31 pp, PDF, opt-in).

The bottom line from the IBM, Centrify and many other studies is that we’re in a Zero Trust Security (ZTS) world now and the sooner a digital business can excel at it, the more protected they will be from security threats. ZTS begins with Next-Gen Access (NGA) by recognizing that every employee’s identity is the new security perimeter for any digital business.

Key takeaways from the study include the following:

  • U.S. based breaches are the most expensive globally, costing on average $7.91M, more than double the global average of $3.86M. Nations in the Middle East have the second-most expensive breaches globally, averaging $5.31M, followed by Canada, where the average breach costs a digital business $4.74M. Globally a breach costs a digital business $3.86M this year, up from $3.62M last year. With the costs of breaches escalating so quickly and the cost of a breach in the U.S. leading all nations and outdistancing the global average 2X, it’s time for more digital businesses to consider a Zero Trust Security strategy. See Forrester Principal Analyst Chase Cunningham’s recent blog post What ZTX Means For Vendors And Users, from the Forrester Research blog for where to get started.

  • The number of breached records is soaring in the U.S., the 3rd leading nation of breached records, 6,850 records above the global average. The Ponemon Institute found that the average size of a data breach increased 2.2% this year, with the U.S. leading all nations in breached records. It now takes an average of 266 days to identify and contain a breach (Mean-time-to-identify (MTTI) a breach is 197 days and the mean-time-to-contain (MTTC) is 69 days), so more digital businesses in the Middle East, India, and the U.S. should consider reorienting their security strategies to a Zero Trust Security Model.

  • French and U.S. digital businesses pay a heavy price in customer churn when a breach happens, among the highest in the world. The following graphic compares abnormally high customer churn rates, the size of the data breach, average total cost, and per capita costs by country.

  • U.S. companies lead the world in lost business caused by a security breach with $4.2M lost per incident, over $2M more than digital businesses from the Middle East. Ponemon found that U.S. digitally-based businesses pay an exceptionally high cost for customer churn caused by a data breaches. Factors contributing to the high cost of lost business include abnormally high turnover of customers, the high costs of acquiring new customers in the U.S., loss of brand reputation and goodwill. U.S. customers also have a myriad of competitive options and their loyalty is more difficult to preserve. The study finds that thanks to current notification laws, customers have a greater awareness of data breaches and have higher expectations regarding how the companies they are loyal to will protect customer records and data.

Conclusion

The IBM study foreshadows an increasing level of speed, scale, and sophistication when it comes to how breaches are orchestrated. With the average breach globally costing $4.36M and breach costs and lost customer revenue soaring in the U.S,. it’s clear we’re living in a world where Zero Trust should be the new mandate.

Zero Trust Security starts with Next-Gen Access to secure every endpoint and attack surface a digital business relies on for daily operations, and limit access and privilege to protect the “keys to the kingdom,” which gives hackers the most leverage. Security software providers including Centrify are applying advanced analytics and machine learning to thwart breaches and many other forms of attacks that seek to exploit weak credentials and too much privilege. Zero Trust is a proven way to stay at parity or ahead of escalating threats.

Zero Trust Security Is The Growth Catalyst IoT Needs

  • McKinsey predicts the Internet of Things (IoT) market will be worth $581B for ICT-based spend alone, growing at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) between 7 and 15% according to their study Internet of Things The IoT opportunity – Are you ready to capture a once-in-a-lifetime value pool?
  • By 2020, Discrete Manufacturing, Transportation & Logistics and Utilities industries are projected to spend $40B each on IoT platforms, systems, and services according to Statista.
  • The Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) market is predicted to reach $123B in 2021, attaining a CAGR of 7.3% through 2020 according to Accenture.

IoT is forecast to be one of the tech industry’s fastest-growing sectors in the next three to five years, as many market estimates like the ones above illustrate. The one factor that will fuel IoT to rapidly grow to new heights or deflate demand just as quickly is security across the myriad of endpoints.

Zero Trust Security (ZTS) is the force multiplier IoT needs to reach its true potential and must be designed into IoT networks if they are going to flex and scale for every endpoint and protect every threat surface.

IoT Needs A Security Wake-Up Call Now  

Industrial Control Systems (ICS) provides a cautionary tale for anyone who thinks enterprise networks don’t need endpoint security and the ability to control access from any point inside or outside an organization.

Chemical, electricity, food & beverage, gas, healthcare, oil, transportation, water services and other key infrastructure industries have relied on ICS applications and platforms for decades. They were designed to deliver reliability and uptime first with little if any effort put into securing them.

However, the glaring security gaps in ICS provide the following lessons for IoT adoption now and in the future:

  • Only digitally enable an endpoint that can verify if every person or device attempting access is authorized, down to the risk score and device level. ICS endpoints were added as fast as utility companies and manufacturers could enable them with speed of deployment, reliability measurement, and uptime being the highest priorities. Security wasn’t a priority with the results being predictable: now many nations’ power grids are vulnerable to attack due to this oversight. With IoT, utilities need to start designing in security to the sensor level using Next-Gen Access as the foundation, leveraging Identity-as-a-Service (IDaaS), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) and Privileged Access Management (PAM) to enable Zero Trust strategies organization-wide. Next-Gen Access calculates a risk score predicated on previous authorized login and resource access patterns for each verified account.  When there is an anomaly in account credentials’ use, users are requested to verify with Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA).
  • An ICS doesn’t learn from security mistakes, while NGA gets smarter with every breach attempt. A typical ICS is designed to make operations more efficient and reliable, not secure. Even with many endpoints of an ICS being digitally-enabled today with device retrofitting common, security still isn’t a priority. Instead of digitally enabling IoT sensors purely for efficiency, Next-Gen Access needs to be designed in at the sensor level to protect entire networks. Zero Trust Security’s four main pillars are to verify the user, validate their device, limit access and privilege, and learn and adapt. Machine learning is relied on for learning and adapting in real-time to access requests and threats.
  • ICS assumes no bad actors exist while NGA knows how to stop them. Bad actors, or those who want to breach a system for financial gain or to harm a business, aren’t just outside. Verizon’s 2017 Data Breach Investigations Report finds that 25% of all breaches are initiated from inside an organization and 75% outside which makes NGA essential for attaining Zero Trust Security on an enterprise level. Of the ICS being protected today, the majority are reliant on trusted and untrusted domains, a security technology over two decades old. When organized crime, state-sponsored hacking organizations or internal employees can quickly compromise privileged credentials, entire utility systems are at risk.
  • Replacing security-obsolete ICS with IoT-based systems that have NGA designed in to flex for every person and device shuts down physical and digital attack vectors organization-wide. The strategic security plan for any IoT-enabled enterprise has to prioritize faster automated discovery, configuration and response if it’s going to survive against highly orchestrated attacks. NGA has proven effective at thwarting unauthorized privileged credential attacks while continually learning from usage patterns of authorized and unauthorized users.

Conclusion

ICS have some of the most porous, incomplete security perimeters of any enterprise systems. 63% of all ICS-related vulnerabilities cause processing plants to lose control of operations, and 71% can obfuscate or block the view of operations immediately according to the Dragos Industrial Control Vulnerabilities 2017 in Review.  ICS needs an overhaul starting with Next-Gen Access, enabling Zero Trust Security across every employee and device that forms an organizations’ security perimeter.

Bain & Company released a study on the price elasticity of IoT-enabled products by security level. They found that 93% of the executives surveyed would pay an average of 22% more for devices with better security. Taken together, Bain estimates that improving security solutions for these devices could grow the IoT cybersecurity market by $9B to $11B.

The speed at which manufacturers are building smart, connected products accentuates the need for Zero Trust Security powered by Next-Gen Access from their inception. Security as an afterthought won’t be effective at the scale and pace of IoT.

Source: Bain Snap Chart, July 98, 2018 Better IoT Security Could Grow Device Market

 

Zero Trust Security Update From The SecurIT Zero Trust Summit

  • Identities, not systems, are the new security perimeter for any digital business, with 81% of breaches involving weak, default or stolen passwords.
  • 53% of enterprises feel they are more susceptible to threats since 2015.
  • 51% of enterprises suffered at least one breach in the past 12 months and malicious insider incidents increased 11% year-over-year.

These and many other fascinating insights are from SecurIT: the Zero Trust Summit for CIOs and CISOs held last month in San Francisco, CA. CIO and CSO produced the event that included informative discussions and panels on how enterprises are adopting Next-Gen Access (NGA) and enabling Zero Trust Security (ZTS). What made the event noteworthy were the insights gained from presentations and panels where senior IT executives from Akamai, Centrify, Cisco, Cylance, EdgeWise, Fortinet, Intel, Live Nation Entertainment and YapStone shared their key insights and lessons learned from implementing Zero Trust Security.

Zero Trust’s creator is John Kindervag, a former Forrester Analyst, and Field CTO at Palo Alto Networks.  Zero Trust Security is predicated on the concept that an organization doesn’t trust anything inside or outside its boundaries and instead verifies anything and everything before granting access. Please see Dr. Chase Cunningham’s excellent recent blog post, What ZTX means for vendors and users, for an overview of the current state of ZTS. Dr. Chase Cunningham is a Principal Analyst at Forrester.

Key takeaways from the Zero Trust Summit include the following:

  • Identities, not systems, are the new security perimeter for any digital business, with 81% of breaches involving weak, default or stolen passwords. Tom Kemp, Co-Founder, and CEO, Centrify, provided key insights into the current state of enterprise IT security and how existing methods aren’t scaling completely enough to protect every application, endpoint, and infrastructure of any digital business. He illustrated how $86B was spent on cybersecurity, yet a stunning 66% of companies were still breached. Companies targeted for breaches averaged five or more separate breaches already. The following graphic underscores how identities are the new enterprise perimeter, making NGA and ZTS a must-have for any digital business.

  • 53% of enterprises feel they are more susceptible to threats since 2015. Chase Cunningham’s presentation, Zero Trust and Why Does It Matter, provided insights into the threat landscape and a thorough definition of ZTX, which is the application of a Zero Trust framework to an enterprise. Dr. Cunningham is a Principal Analyst at Forrester Research serving security and risk professionals. Forrester found the percentage of enterprises who feel they are more susceptible to threats nearly doubled in two years, jumping from 28% in 2015 to 53% in 2017. Dr. Cunningham provided examples of how breaches have immediate financial implications on the market value of any business with specific focus on the Equifax breach.

Presented by Dr. Cunningham during SecurIT: the Zero Trust Summit for CIOs and CISOs

  • 51% of enterprises suffered at least one breach in the past 12 months and malicious insider incidents increased 11% year-over-year. 43% of confirmed breaches in the last 12 months are from an external attack, 24% from internal attacks, 17% are from third-party incidents and 16% from lost or stolen assets. Consistent with Verizon’s 2018 Data Breach Investigations Report use of privileged credential access is a leading cause of breaches today.

Presented by Dr. Cunningham during SecurIT: the Zero Trust Summit for CIOs and CISOs

                       

  • One of Zero Trust Security’s innate strengths is the ability to flex and protect the perimeter of any growing digital business at the individual level, encompassing workforce, customers, distributors, and Akamai, Cisco, EdgeWise, Fortinet, Intel, Live Nation Entertainment and YapStone each provided examples of how their organizations are relying on NGA to enable ZTS enterprise-wide. Every speaker provided examples of how ZTS delivers several key benefits including the following: First, ZTS reduces the time to breach detection and improves visibility throughout a network. Second, organizations provided examples of how ZTS is reducing capital and operational expenses for security, in addition to reducing the scope and cost of compliance initiatives. All companies presenting at the conference provided examples of how ZTS is enabling greater data awareness and insight, eliminating inter-silo finger-pointing over security responsibilities and for several, enabling digital business transformation. Every organization is also seeing ZTS thwart the exfiltration and destruction of their data.

Conclusion

The SecurIT: the Zero Trust Summit for CIOs and CISOs event encapsulated the latest advances in how NGA is enabling ZTS by having enterprises who are adopting the framework share their insights and lessons learned. It’s fascinating to see how Akamai, Cisco, Intel, Live Nation Entertainment, YapStone, and others are tailoring ZTS to their specific customer-driven goals. Each also shared their plans for growth and how security in general and NGA and ZTS specifically are protecting customer and company data to ensure growth continues, uninterrupted.

 

 

Analytics Are Empowering Next-Gen Access And Zero Trust Security

Employee identities are the new security perimeter of any business.

80% of IT security breaches involve privileged credential access according to a Forrester study. According to the Verizon Mobile Security Index 2018 Report, 89% of organizations are relying on just a single security strategy to keep their mobile networks safe. And with Gartner predicting worldwide security spending reaching $96B this year, up 8% from 2017, it’s evident enterprises must adopt a more vigilant, focused strategy for protecting every threat surface and access point of their companies. IT security strategies based on trusted and untrusted domains are being rendered insufficient as hackers camouflage their attacks through compromised, privileged credentials. It’s happening so often that eight in ten breaches are now the result of compromised employee identities.

Thus, taking a Zero Trust Security (ZTS) approach to ensure every potential threat surface and endpoint, both within and outside a company, is protected, has become vital in today’s dynamic threat landscape. ZTS is an essential strategy for any digital business whose perimeters flex in response to customer demand, are using the Internet of Things (IoT) sensors to streamline supply chain and production logistics, and have suppliers, sales teams, support, and services all using mobile apps.  ZTS begins with Next-Gen Access (NGA) by providing companies with the agility they need to secure applications, devices, endpoints, and infrastructure as quickly as needed to support company growth. Both NGA and ZTS are empowered by analytics to anticipate and thwart a wide variety of cyber threats, the most common of which is compromised credential access.

How NGA Leverages Analytics to Secure Every Endpoint

NGA validates every access attempt by capturing and quickly analyzing a wide breadth of data including user identity, device, device operating system, location, time, resource request, and several other factors. As NGA is designed to verify every user and access attempt, it’s foundational to attaining Zero Trust Security across an IT infrastructure. One of the fascinating areas of innovation in enterprise security today is the rapid adoption of analytics and machine learning for verifying users across diverse enterprise networks. NGA platforms calculate and assign a risk score to every access attempt, determining immediately if verified users will get immediate access to resources requested, or be asked to verify their identity further through Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA).

Machine learning-based NGA platforms including Centrify calculate a risk score that quantifies the relative level of trust based on every access attempt across an IT infrastructure. NGA platforms rely on machine learning algorithms to continuously learn and generate contextual intelligence that is used to streamline verified user’s access while thwarting many potential threats ― the most common of which is compromised credentials. IT security teams can combine the insights gained from machine learning, user profiles, and contextual intelligence to fine-tune the variables and attributes that calculate risk scores using cloud-enabled analytics services.  An example of Centrify’s Analytics Services dashboard is shown below:

Visibility and Analytics are a Core Pillar of ZTS

Analytics, machine learning and their combined potential to produce contextual intelligence, real-time risk scores, and secure company perimeters to the individual access attempt level need a continual stream of data to increase their accuracy. Forrester’s Zero Trust Framework, shown below, illustrates how an enterprise-wide ZTS security strategy encompasses workloads, networks, devices, and people.  NGA is the catalyst that makes ZTS scale into each of these areas. It’s evident from the diagram how essential visibility and analytics are to a successful ZTS strategy. NGA provides incident data including reports of anomalous or atypical login and attempted resource behavior. Visibility and analytics applications from IBM, Splunk, Sumologic, and others are relied on to aggregate the data, anticipating and predicting breaches and advanced attacks. The result is a ZTS security strategy that begins with NGA that flexes and scales to the individual perimeter level as a digital business grows.

Source: What ZTX Means For Vendors And Users, Forrester Research Blog, January 23, 2018., Chase Cunningham, Principal Analyst.

Conclusion

Every company, whether they realize it or not, is in a race against time to secure every threat surface that could be compromised and used to steal or destroy data and systems.  Relying on yesterday’s security technologies to protect against tomorrow’s sophisticated, well-orchestrated threats isn’t scaling. Reading through the Verizon Mobile Security Index 2018 Report illustrates why Zero Trust Security is the future. Improving visibility throughout the network and reducing the time to breach detection, stopping malware propagation and reducing the scope and cost of internal and regulatory-mandated compliance requirements are just a few of the business benefits. Analytics and machine learning are the fuel enabling NGA to scale and support ZTS strategies’ success today.

Three Ways Machine Learning Is Revolutionizing Zero Trust Security

Bottom Line: Zero Trust Security (ZTS) starts with Next-Gen Access (NGA). Capitalizing on machine learning technology to enable NGA is essential in achieving user adoption, scalability, and agility in securing applications, devices, endpoints, and infrastructure.

How Next-Gen Access and Machine Learning Enable Zero Trust Security

Zero Trust Security provides digital businesses with the security strategy they need to keep growing by scaling across each new perimeter and endpoint created as a result of growth. ZTS in the context of Next-Gen Access is built on four main pillars: (1) verify the user, (2) validate their device, (3) limit access and privilege, and (4) learn and adapt. The fourth pillar heavily relies on machine learning to discover risky user behavior and apply for conditional access without impacting user experience by looking for contextual and behavior patterns in access data.

As ZTS assumes that untrusted users or actors already exist both inside and outside the network, machine learning provides NGA with the capability to assess data about users, their devices, and behavior to allow access, block access, or enforce additional authentication. With machine learning, policies and user profiles can be adjusted automatically and in real-time. While NGA enabled by machine learning is delivering dashboards and alerts, the real-time response to security threats predicated on risk scores is very effective in thwarting breaches before they start.

Building NGA apps based on machine learning technology yields the benefits of being non-intrusive, supporting the productivity of workforce and business partners, and ultimately allowing digital businesses to grow without interruption. For example, Centrify’s rapid advances in machine learning and Next-Gen Access to enable ZTS strategies makes this company one of the most interesting to watch in enterprise security.

The following are three ways machine learning is revolutionizing Zero Trust Security:

  1. Machine learning enables enterprises to adopt a risk-based security strategy that can flex with their business as it grows. Many digital businesses have realized that “risk is security’s new compliance,” and therefore are implementing a risk-driven rather than a compliance-driven approach. Relying on machine learning technology to assess user, device, and behavioral data for each access request derives a real-time risk score. This risk score can then be used to determine whether to allow access, block access, or step up authentication. In evaluating each access request, machine learning engines process multiple factors, including the location of the access attempt, browser type, operating system, endpoint device status, user attributes, time of day, and unusual recent privilege change. Machine learning algorithms are also scaling to take into account unusual command runs, unusual resource access histories, and any unusual accounts used, unusual privileges requested and used, and more. This approach helps thwart comprised credential attacks, which make up 81% of all hacking-related data breaches, according to Verizon.
  2. Machine learning makes it possible to accomplish security policy alignment at scale. To keep pace with a growing digital business’ need to flex and scale to support new business models, machine learning also assists in automatically adjusting user profiles and access policies based on behavioral patterns. By doing so, the need for IT staffers to review and adjust policies vanishes, freeing them up to focus on things that will grow the business faster and more profitably. On the other hand, end users are not burdened with step-up authentication once a prior abnormal behavior is identified as now typical behavior and therefore both user profile and policies updated.
  3. Machine learning brings greater contextual intelligence into authentication, streamlining the experience and increasing user adoption. Ultimately, the best security is transparent and non-intrusive. That’s where the use of risk-based authentication and machine learning technology comes into play. The main impediment to adoption for multi-factor authentication has been the perceived impact on the productivity and agility of end users. A recent study by Dow Jones Customer Intelligence and Centrify revealed that 62% of CEOs state that multi-factor authentication (MFA) is difficult to manage and is not user-friendly, while only 41% of technical officers (CIOs, CTOs, and CISOs) agree with this assessment. For example, having to manually type in a code that has been transmitted via SMS in addition to the already supplied username and password is often seen as cumbersome. Technology advancements are removing some of these objections by offering a more user-friendly experience, like eliminating the need to manually enter a one-time password on the endpoint, by enabling the user to simply click a button on their smartphone. Nonetheless, some users still express frustration with this additional step, even if it is relatively quick and simple. To overcome these remaining barriers to adoption, machine learning technology contributes to minimizing the exposure to step up authentication over time, as the engine learns and adapts to the behavioral patterns.

In Conclusion

Zero Trust Security through the power of Next-Gen Access is allowing digital businesses to continue on their path of growth while safeguarding their patented ideas and intellectual property. Relying on machine learning technology for Next-Gen Access results in real-time security, allowing to identify high-risk events and ultimately greatly minimizing the effort required to identify threats across today’s hybrid IT environment.

83% Of Enterprises Are Complacent About Mobile Security

  • 89% of organizations are relying on just a single security strategy to keep their mobile networks safe.
  • 61% report that their spending on mobile security had increased in 2017 with 10% saying it had increased significantly.
  • Just 39% of mobile device users in enterprises change all default passwords, and only 38% use strong two-factor authentication on their mobile devices.
  • Just 31% of companies are using mobile device or enterprise mobility management (MDM or EMM).

These and many other insights are from the recently published Verizon Mobile Security Index 2018 Report. The report is available here for download (22 pp., PDF, no opt-in). Verizon commissioned an independent research company to complete the survey in the second half of 2017, interviewing over 600 professionals involved in procuring and managing mobile devices for their organizations. Please see page 20 of the study for additional details on the methodology.

The study found that the accelerating pace of cloud, Internet of Things (IoT), and mobile adoption is outpacing enterprises’ ability to scale security management, leaving companies vulnerable. When there’s a trade-off between the expediency needed to accomplish business performance goals and security, the business goals win the majority of the time. 32% of enterprises are sacrificing security for expediency and business performance, leaving many areas of their core infrastructure unsecured. Enterprises who made this trade-off of expediency over security were 2.4x as likely to suffer data loss or downtime.

Key takeaways from the study include the following:

  • 79% of enterprises consider their employees to be the most significant security threat. The study points out that it’s not due to losing devices, inadvertent security errors or circumventing security policies. It’s the threat of employees using their secured access for financial or personal gain. 58% of senior management leaders interviewed view employees with secure access as the most significant threat. Security platforms that can stop credential attacks using risk assessment models predicated on behavioral pattern matching and analysis by verifying an employee’s identity are flourishing today. One of the leaders in this field is Centrify, who espouses Zero Trust Security. The following graphic from the study shows the priority of which actors enterprise leaders are most concerned about regarding threats, with employees being the most often mentioned.

  • 32% of enterprises have sacrificed security for expediency and business performance leading to 45% of them suffering data loss or downtime. The study found that companies who sacrificed security were also 2.4x more likely to have experienced data loss or downtime as a result of a mobile-related security incident. For the 68% who prioritized security over expediency, just 19% had suffered data loss or downtime.

  • 89% of enterprises are relying on just a single security practice to keep their mobile networks safe. Verizon’s study found that the majority of enterprises are relying on just one security practice to protect their networks. 55% have two in place, and just 14% have four. Of the four security practices, only 39% change all default passwords. Just under half (47%), encrypt the transmission of sensitive data across open, public networks. The following graphic from the study illustrates the percentage of enterprises who have between 1 and all four security practices in place.

  • Just 49% of enterprises have a policy regarding the use of public WiFi, and even fewer (47%) encrypt the transmission of sensitive data across open, public networks. A startling high 71% of respondents use public Wi-Fi networks for work tasks, despite their companies prohibiting their use. Taking risks with unsecured Wi-Fi networks for expediency and business performance being done at the expense of security supports a key finding of this study. Nearly one in three (32%) of enterprises are sacrificing security for expediency and business performance, including accessing unsecured Wi-Fi networks. The following infographic from the study explains a few of the many security threats inherent in the design and use of public Wi-Fi networks.

 

Five Ways Machine Learning Can Save Your Company From A Security Breach Meltdown

  • $86B was spent on security in 2017, yet 66% of companies have still been breached an average of five or more times.
  • Just 55% of CEOs say their organizations have experienced a breach, while 79% of CTOs acknowledge breaches have occurred. One in approximately four CEOs (24%) aren’t aware if their companies have even had a security breach.
  • 62% of CEOs inaccurately cite malware as the primary threat to cybersecurity.
  • 68% of executives whose companies experienced significant breaches in hindsight believe that the breach could have been prevented by implementing more mature identity and access management strategies.

These and many other fascinating findings are from the recently released Centrify and Dow Jones Customer Intelligence study, CEO Disconnect is Weakening Cybersecurity (31 pp, PDF, opt-in).

One of the most valuable findings from the study is how CEOs can reduce the risk of a security breach meltdown by rethinking their core cyber defense strategy by maturing their identity and access management strategies.

However, 62% of CEOs have the impression that multi-factor authentication is difficult to manage. Thus, their primary security concern is primarily driven by how to avoid delivering poor user experiences. In this context, machine learning can assist in strengthening the foundation of a multi-factor authentication platform to increase effectiveness while streamlining user experiences.

Five Ways Machine Learning Saves Companies From Security Breach Meltdowns

Machine learning is solving the security paradox all enterprises face today. Spending millions of dollars on security solutions yet still having breaches occur that are crippling their ability to compete and grow, enterprises need to confront this paradox now. There are many ways machine learning can be used to improve enterprise security. With identity being the primary point of attacks, the following are five ways machine learning can be leveraged in the context of identity and access management to minimize the risk of falling victim to a data breach.

  1. Thwarting compromised credential attacks by using risk-based models that validate user identity based on behavioral pattern matching and analysis. Machine learning excels at using constraint-based and pattern matching algorithms, which makes them ideal for analyzing behavioral patterns of people signing in to systems that hold sensitive information. Compromised credentials are the most common and lethal type of breach. Applying machine learning to this challenge by using a risk-based model that “learns’ behavior over time is stopping security breaches today.
  2. Attaining Zero Trust Security (ZTS) enterprise-wide using risk scoring models that flex to a businesses’ changing requirements. Machine learning enables Zero Trust Security (ZTS) frameworks to scale enterprise-wide, providing threat assessments and graphs that scale across every location. These score models are invaluable in planning and executing growth strategies quickly across broad geographic regions. CEOs need to see multi-factor authentication as a key foundation of ZTS frameworks that can help them grow faster. Machine learning enables IT to accelerate the development of Zero Trust Security (ZTS) frameworks and scale them globally. Removing security-based roadblocks that get in the way of future growth needs to be the highest priority CEOs address. A strong ZTS framework is as much a contributor to revenue as is any distribution or selling channel.
  3. Streamlining security access for new employees by having persona-based risk model profiles that can be quickly customized by IT for specific needs. CEOs most worry about security’s poor user experience and its impacts on productivity. The good news is that the early multi-factor authentication workflows that caused poor user experiences are being redefined with contextual insights and intelligence based on more precise persona-based risk scoring models. As the models “learn” the behaviors of employees regarding access, the level of authentication changes and the experience improves. By learning new behavior patterns over time, machine learning is accelerating how quickly employees can gain access to secured services and systems.
  4. Provide predictive analytics and insights into which are the most probable sources of threats, what their profiles are and what priority to assign to them. CIOs and the security teams they manage need to have enterprise-wide visibility of all potential threats, ideally prioritized by potential severity. Machine learning algorithms are doing this today, providing threat assessments and defining which are the highest priority threats that CIOs and their teams need to address.
  5. Stop malware-based breaches by learning how hackers modify the code bases in an attempt to bypass multi-factor authentication. One of the favorite techniques for hackers to penetrate an enterprise network is to use impersonation-based logins and passwords to pass malware onto corporate servers. Malware breaches can be extremely challenging to track. One approach that is working is when enterprises implement a ZTS framework and create specific scenarios to trap, stop and destroy suspicious malware activity.
%d bloggers like this: