Skip to content

Posts tagged ‘$MSFT’

AI Security market 2025 funding data, top startups, and the ServiceNow factor

ServiceNow dropped $11.6 billion on security acquisitions in 2025 alone. Armis for $7.75 billion. Moveworks for $2.85 billion. Veza for roughly $1 billion. In 2025, just one company, ServiceNow, spent more on acquiring security startups than 175 startups raised in two years. Meanwhile, the entire AI security startup ecosystem raised $8.5 billion across 175 companies over 24 months. That single data point should reshape how security leaders think about vendor consolidation and how AI builders think about their exit paths.

I analyzed Crunchbase data covering every AI security startup that raised Series A, B, or C funding between January 2024 and December 2025. The patterns are striking.

The acceleration is real

Q1 2024: $274 million across 8 deals. Q4 2025: $2.17 billion across 28 deals. That’s 8x growth in quarterly funding over two years.

The full-year numbers tell the story more clearly. 2024 saw $2.16 billion in total funding. 2025 hit $6.34 billion, nearly tripling. Average deal sizes jumped from $34 million to $54 million. This isn’t a gentle upward trend. The market is restructuring in real time.

Where the money flows

Network and Zero Trust infrastructure captured $1.9 billion across 44 companies. Tailscale‘s $161 million Series C reflects what enterprises already know. VPN architectures are dying. Identity-based access is replacing them.

Threat Detection and SOC automation drew $1.2 billion across 28 companies. 7AI‘s $130 million Series A stands out as one of the largest A funding rounds in this category. The bet: AI agents can handle the full security operations lifecycle at a scale human analysts cannot match.

Identity and Access Management pulled $990 million. But here’s what matters: that money went to just 6 companies. Saviynt‘s $700 million Series B dominates the category. When one company captures 71% of a category’s funding at Series B, investors see platform consolidation ahead. ServiceNow’s Veza acquisition, three weeks later, validated that thesis.

Insights into deal sizes

Median tells a different story from average deal sizes. Series A median: $20 million. Series A average: $28 million. The gap widens at later stages. Series C median: $85 million. Series C average: $119 million.

Translation: mega-deals skew the data significantly. Eighteen companies raised $100 million or more. Those 18 deals represent 10% of companies but 40% of total funding. For every Saviynt raising $700 million, dozens of startups are raising $15-25 million Series A rounds.

The AI/LLM security gap

Only 13 companies focus specifically on securing AI systems, LLMs, and agentic applications. Total funding: $414 million. That’s less than 5% of the $8.5 billion total. For context: ServiceNow paid more for Veza alone than the entire AI/LLM security category raised in two years.

The players building in this space:

Noma Security ($100M, Series B). Unified AI and agent security platform.

Credo AI ($21M, Series B). AI governance and compliance automation.

Lakera ($20M, Series A). Real-time GenAI security against LLM vulnerabilities.

Prompt Security ($18M, Series A). Enterprise generative AI adoption platform.

GetReal Security ($17.5M, Series A). Deepfake and AI-generated impersonation defense.

Jericho Security ($15M, Series A). Training against generative AI-powered attacks.

Enterprises are deploying AI systems at unprecedented rates. Shadow AI breaches cost $4.63 million per incident. That’s $670,000 more than standard breaches, according to IBM’s 2025 Cost of a Data Breach Report. Model Context Protocol vulnerabilities. Prompt injection attacks. Data exfiltration through AI assistants. The attack surface expands while protection lags.

Either these 13 companies scale rapidly, established players acquire their way into the space, or CISOs face a protection gap without commercial solutions.

How spending breaks out geographically

The U.S. captured $6.1 billion across 119 companies. That’s 71% of total funding. Israel remains the second hub: 15 companies, $738 million. Germany, the UK, and Canada trail with single-digit percentages.

Within the U.S., California dominates: $2.7 billion across 62 companies. That’s more than all non-U.S. markets combined ($2.4 billion). Texas ($865M), New York ($667M), and Colorado ($295M) round out the top states.

The concentration creates vendor risk. Regulatory fragmentation between the U.S. and EU markets. Geopolitical tensions affecting Israeli companies. Single-region dependency in security infrastructure. These are fundamental considerations for enterprise security architects.

ServiceNow’s acquisitions signal large-scale consolidation

ServiceNow’s 2025 acquisition spree warrants its own analysis. Armis brings cyber-physical security and OT/IoT visibility. Moveworks adds agentic AI capabilities. Veza delivers identity security for the AI era. The company calls it an “AI control tower.” A unified security stack that sees, decides, and acts across the entire technology footprint.

The driver: ServiceNow’s Security and Risk business crossed $1 billion in annual contract value in Q3 2025. They expect Armis alone to triple their market opportunity. When a platform vendor invests $11.6 billion in its own security workflows, point solutions become acquisition targets or competitors.

What this means for 2026

For security leaders: Map your vendor portfolio against both funding momentum and M&A activity. Startups with strong backing will survive consolidation. Others won’t. Audit your AI deployment pipeline against available protections. The gap between AI adoption and AI security is widening. Accelerate zero-trust adoption while solutions mature.

For AI builders: Security isn’t a feature to add later. The $414 million flowing into AI/LLM security represents smart money recognizing that unprotected AI systems are enterprise liabilities. Build with guardrails or build vulnerabilities.

Analysis based on Crunchbase data covering 175 AI security startups that raised Series A, B, or C funding between January 2024 and December 2025. ServiceNow acquisition data from the company’s press releases dated December 2025.

Why Cloud Computing is Accelerating in the Enterprise

Cloud computing gaining in the enterprise Translating time into dollars matters far more to many CEOs I’ve spoken with versus what platform their applications are running on.

What matters most is getting all they can out of every hour their business is operating.  They are all focused on getting beyond the constraints that held their growth back in the past – everyone wants a growth accelerator today.  For manufacturers especially, this includes applications with depth of functionality that can be quickly deployed regionally, and in more cases than ever, globally as well.  Line-of-business leaders want applications that make an immediate impact on their entire value chain.

Just having a cloud strategy is not enough for any enterprise software company anymore. Owning the pain prospects and customers go through daily to get work done is all that matters.  Every application and platform component needs to contribute to the goal of reducing customer’s challenges of doing business.  In studying companies who excel at this, I’ve often used stock market indices to see how they compare to market averages and their competitors.

Charting Progress Using the Cloud Computing Stock Index

Creating and using stock indices to track the performance of specific industry and market sectors is a great way to cut through hype.  I’ve been using these for over a decade to track industries and markets of interest, and have built the Cloud Computing Stock Index. You can download the latest summary here.  If there are companies you think need to be included please let me know.  I deliberately left out IBM, Google, Microsoft, Oracle and SAP as a prerequisite is that a firm derive at least 50% or greater revenue from cloud-based applications and services.

The graph below shows all-time performance of the Cloud Computing Index relative to Microsoft, Salesforce.com. NetSuite and Workday.

Figure 1 stock index

Key Take Aways

  • NetSuite posted a 62.6% increase in stock performance, followed by Workday (+20.57%), Salesforce (+4.23%) and the Cloud Computing Index (+4%) with Microsoft seeing a 8.18% decline in share price during the period.
  • NetSuite, Salesforce and Workday continue to gain new customers in the mid-tier and enterprise areas of the market based on depth of functionality, rapid application development (RAD), and increasing success creating alliances with system integration, selling and technology partners.
  • Workday’s expertise in Human Capital Management is accentuated by the depth of analytics and trend analysis and expertise in cloud-based integrations.  Their depth of functional expertise in these areas is leading to rapid growth.
  •  NetSuite is succeeding with its two-tier ERP selling strategy against long-standing ERP vendors including Oracle, SAP and others.

Bottom line:  Salesforce, NetSuite and Workday show how developing cloud-based applications designed for ease of use and speed of deployment are winning new customers in the enterprise – and driving up their stock price as a result.

Specifics on the Cloud Computing Stock Index

I used The Cloud Times 100 as the basis of the index, and included the 23 following companies, all of which are publically traded.  These include:

  • Akamai Technologies.
  • Amazon.com, Inc.
  • ARM Holdings plc
  • CA, Inc.
  • Cisco Systems, Inc.
  • Citrix Systems, Inc.
  • EMC Corporation
  • F5 Networks, Inc.
  • Fusion-IO, Inc.
  • Intuit
  • Juniper Networks, Inc.
  • Keynote Systems, Inc.
  • NetSuite Inc
  • Qualys Inc
  • Rackspace Hosting, Inc.
  • Red Hat, Inc.
  • Riverbed Technology…
  • Salesforce.com, inc.
  • Symantec Corporation
  • Trend Micro Incorporated
  • VMware, Inc.
  • Websense Inc.
  • Workday Inc

 Note: I do not hold equity positions or work for any of the companies mentioned in this blog post or included in the Cloud Computing Stock Index.