Skip to content

Posts tagged ‘AI security’

Aug 10

34% of enterprises govern AI with policies they only partly follow. Gartner’s first AI Governance Hype Cycle shows CISOs what to fund first.

Gartner Hype Cycle for AI Governance, 2026, showing AI cybersecurity governance, AI governance platforms, and agentic AI risk innovations plotted across the innovation trigger, peak, trough, slope, and plateau phases. Please click on the graphic to expand for easier reading.

Gartner’s 2026 AI Leaders Effectiveness Survey found that 34% of organizations have well-defined AI governance structures and policies for managing risks, ethics, and compliance. Those same organizations report only partial adherence to the rules they wrote, while another 22% still rely on basic or ad hoc policies. Only 7% qualify as recognized leaders in ethical AI.

That gap between writing the policy and living by it is what Gartner’s first Hype Cycle for AI Governance, 2026 is built to address. Published July 21, 2026, the inaugural cycle plots 32 innovations and ranks each by benefit rating and years to mainstream adoption. CISOs and enterprise architects get a planning map that builds on Gartner’s forecast that agentic AI will overtake chatbot spending by 2027. Throughout this post, I use “rogue agents” as my editorial shorthand for unsanctioned AI agents operating outside governance perimeters.

The two clusters that carry the security agenda

The report organizes its 32 innovations around six enterprise trends. Two carry the security agenda. Agentic AI oversight and life cycle governance is the first, grouping agentic AI governance, agent development life cycle, AI agent identity, AI engineering, AI gateways and AI governance platforms under one trend. Advancing AI security is the second, covering AI TRiSM, AI cybersecurity governance, disinformation security, zero-trust data governance, mechanistic interpretability and AI product attribution and transparency. Together they define where governance stacks connect to identity systems, traffic controls and incident response playbooks. For how these gaps show up in spending data, see my analysis of Gartner’s $248.9B security forecast.

Five innovations that pay off in under two years

Table 1, the Priority Matrix, ranks every innovation by benefit rating and adoption timeline. Only five entries land in the “Less Than 2 Years” column. Responsible AI sits alone in the Transformational row, Gartner’s highest rating. AI guardrails, data access governance, digital ethics and ontologies all carry High benefit ratings at the same timeline. Gartner calls these the near-term priorities for scalable governance. CISOs should fund them first.

Please click on the image to expand for easier reading.

The two-to-five-year column is the densest band. Thirteen innovations carry a High benefit rating there, including agentic AI governance, AI agent identity, AI TRiSM, zero-trust data governance and third-party risk management. That band is where CISOs will build governance stacks over the next several budget cycles. For context on spending already flowing to AI-related capabilities, see my breakdown of Gartner’s $244.2B security forecast.

Where AI cybersecurity governance actually lands

AI cybersecurity governance carries a Moderate benefit rating at the Innovation Trigger, five to ten years from mainstream adoption. That placement may surprise CISOs who expected Gartner to rate it higher. The profile’s key goals are to prevent shadow AI, minimize attack surfaces and ensure visibility and response to incidents. The placement is a market signal, not a dismissal. Tooling is early, but the need is urgent enough that CISOs should treat AI cybersecurity governance as an architecture requirement today.

What the Priority Matrix tells your board

The report leads with two strategic planning assumptions that carry board-level weight. Enterprises implementing AI governance will outperform ungoverned competitors in AI adoption by 25% by 2029. The downside is just as concrete. Autonomous agents identifying minor consumer rights violations and turning them into lawsuits will increase corporate settlement costs by 15% over the same period. Growth-oriented executives respond to the first number. Risk-averse ones respond to the second.

Turning the curve into controls

Start by mapping your AI agent footprint, sanctioned and unsanctioned, across SaaS platforms, internal applications and shadow IT. From there, match the Hype Cycle’s innovations to four governance domains. The identity and access layer runs on AI agent identity and AI governance platforms. Data classification draws on AI guardrails, data access governance and zero-trust data governance, while AI gateways and AI TRiSM handle traffic mediation. Agent risk management anchors in agentic AI governance and the agent development life cycle. Build all four as shared services. For how agent sprawl is reshaping security spending, see my roundup of agentic AI forecasts and market estimates, 2026.

What these numbers add up to

Gartner’s inaugural Hype Cycle for AI Governance puts 32 innovations on the curve. Only five reach mainstream adoption in under two years. The security-relevant capabilities cluster in the two-to-five-year band, which means CISOs have a narrow window to build governance stacks before agent footprints outpace controls. The 34% adherence stat is the warning, and the Priority Matrix is the roadmap out of it.

This post is my personal reflection on Gartner’s AI governance research from a CISO and enterprise architecture perspective. It does not represent any employer or client.

Source: Gartner, Hype Cycle for AI Governance, 2026, Svetlana Sicular, Var Shankar, Lauren Kornutick, Sumit Agarwal, 21 July 2026, G00854164.

Aug 5

Gartner’s $5.95 trillion AI forecast puts the chatbot era on a 2027 deadline

Spending on the chatbots and assistants embedded in enterprise software peaks at $272.6 billion in 2027 and then shrinks every year through 2030. Gartner buried that projection inside the 2Q26 update of its worldwide AI spending forecast, published July 24, and it matters more than the headline total. By 2030, embedded chatbot spending falls back to $205.8 billion, a hair above its 2025 starting point.

Embedded agenticAI takes the money instead, growing from $88.2 billion in 2025 to $1 trillion by 2030, an 11.4x expansion inside a single software category.

None of that slows the topline. Worldwide AI spending reaches $2.67 trillion in 2026, up 49.5% from 2025, on its way to $5.95 trillion by 2030. The figure Gartner published in May was $2.59 trillion for this year. Ninety days later, the client-facing number runs $74.8 billion higher, and the firm added $496.8 billion to its comparable 2025 through 2030 outlook in a single quarter.

Four tables below show where the money lands, which segments stall, and what Gartner changed its mind about between April and July.

Where $5.95 trillion lands

Infrastructure stays the biggest line through 2030 at $2.79 trillion, even as its share of total spending slides from 55% in 2025 to 46.9% at the end of the window. AI-optimized servers alone reach $981.7 billion by 2030, a 3.4x jump from 2025, and AI processing semiconductors add another $656.4 billion. O

One caution before quoting the total anywhere. Gartner’s note flags the forecast as a view across the whole AI value chain, so the chip and the server it ships inside both get counted. Read $5.95 trillion as the size of the AI economy, not as net end-user budgets.

Devices carry more of the infrastructure number than most readers expect. Business and consumer AI devices combine for $904.4 billion in 2030, and $647.4 billion of that is consumer hardware, the AI PCs and phones landing in shopping carts rather than data centers.

Growth flattens fast after next year. Total spending rises 49% in 2026 and 36% in 2027, then steps down to 21%, 18% and 15% through 2030, while infrastructure decelerates from 51% growth this year to 9% at the end of the forecast.

Of the $883.8 billion in net-new AI spending arriving in 2026, infrastructure absorbs $502.5 billion, or 57 cents of every new dollar. The shape of the curve says the buildout peaks now and software inherits the growth.

Farther down the board, AI cybersecurity at $220.9 billion and AI agents and assistants at $219.9 billion finish 2030 within $1 billion of each other. Gartner created the agents category only this quarter.

Agentic AI crosses $1 trillion inside enterprise software

Gartner rebuilt its segmentation this quarter, splitting cross-functional and consumer agents out of AI software and adding consumer agents to the forecast for the first time. The new structure exposes a replacement cycle the old rollup hid. Inside enterprise software, agentic AI overtakes chatbots in 2027, the same year chatbot spending tops out, and from that peak to 2030 the embedded chatbot line surrenders $66.8 billion.

Cross-functional agents, the ones that work across software from multiple vendors, start from a base of zero. Gartner books $347 million for cross-functional agentic AI in 2026 and $78.1 billion in 2030, a number it raised this quarter on the thesis that these agents begin cannibalizing traditional SaaS by decade’s end. The ceiling matters as much as the curve. Against $1.21 trillion in total 2030 AI software spending, $78.1 billion says the incumbents hold the decade, because data access, integration complexity and execution reliability hold the category back from serious SaaS competition until 2030, in Gartner’s read.

The buy-versus-build verdict is just as lopsided. Agent builder platforms, the tooling for constructing your own agents, reach only $12.6 billion by 2030, so embedded agentic AI outspends them nearly 80 to 1. The first production agent most companies run will ship inside software they already own. Gartner describes exactly that race, with vendors across software categories embedding agentic AI to defend their installed bases against cross-functional challengers.

Consumer agents barely register yet in dollar terms. Gartner carries $26.9 million for consumer agentic AI in 2026, then $17.7 billion in 2027 as paid consumer agents arrive at scale, building to $51.8 billion by 2030. Adding consumer agents and assistants lifted Gartner’s 2030 total by $133 billion. For how these agent numbers stack against other analyst estimates, see my roundup of agentic AI forecasts and market estimates, 2026.

AI security expands 8.5x and splits in two

AI cybersecurity grows from $25.9 billion in 2025 to $220.9 billion in 2030, an 8.5x expansion at a 53.5% compound rate. Spending in the category grew 140% in 2025, and Gartner models another 98% jump this year. AI cybersecurity and AI data were also the only two markets left completely untouched between the 1Q26 and 2Q26 forecasts, which makes security the steadiest conviction in the entire model. For the standalone security spending outlook, see my breakdown of Gartner’s 2Q26 information security forecast.

Two markets move at different speeds inside the category. AI-amplified security, meaning AI capability inside security tooling, carries the volume and reaches $204.5 billion by 2030. Securing AI, the discipline of protecting AI systems themselves, runs smaller and faster, from $1.5 billion in 2025 to $16.4 billion in 2030 at a 60.4% compound rate.

Set the security numbers against the agent forecast and an exposure gap opens. The 2030 outlook has enterprises running $1.08 trillion of embedded and cross-functional agentic software while spending $16.4 billion to secure AI systems, roughly $66 of agentic software for every $1 of securing-AI budget. AI observability and governance tooling adds just $3.9 billion more. A software wave that large riding on a security ratio that thin is the budget argument CISOs should be starting now.

The fastest growth goes to whatever cuts the bill

Rank every segment by compound growth and one pattern jumps out, because the fastest-growing lines are the ones that make AI cheaper. Synthetic data generation leads the entire forecast at a 142.5% compound rate, expanding 84x from $146 million in 2025 to $12.2 billion in 2030. AI-ready datasets, the licensed real-data alternative, peak at $583 million in 2029 and then decline, leaving synthetic data outselling licensed data 22 to 1 by 2030. Gartner is forecasting the substitution of purchased data itself.

Domain-specific language models tell the same cost story at larger scale. DSLMs and specialized models grow 210% in 2026 and compound at 84.5% through 2030, rising from 12.2% of all model spend to 24.3%. Cost pressure also explains the strangest revision in the update. Gartner cut $57.8 billion in cumulative dollars from its generative AI model forecast while raising the segment’s 2026 growth rate from 110% to 117%, which nets out to more deployments running on cheaper models and smaller checks. Arunasree Cheparthi, a senior principal research analyst at Gartner and one of the forecast’s authors, said in the firm’s July 20 platforms and models announcement that spending “is shifting toward providers who can demonstrate clear value.”

What Gartner changed in 90 days

Between the April forecast and this one, Gartner added $500.8 billion to AI infrastructure across the 2025 through 2030 window, the largest revision in the update, and did it while flagging memory-related price increases. The note calls infrastructure demand inelastic to that pricing pressure, because hyperscalers keep buying AI-optimized servers on the conviction that model capabilities improve through 2030.

Software took the other side of the trade. AI software gained $191.9 billion and application development platforms picked up $10.7 billion. Gartner lifted the 2026 app-dev growth rate from 28% to 39% as enterprises build custom AI applications and demand usage tracking to prove the spend. The cuts land on everything that resembles consulting or plumbing. AI services lost $80.7 billion across the window, with every single year revised down, and platforms for data science and machine learning lost $68.2 billion, including an 8% cut to 2027 alone.

The services cut hides a structural shift rather than a retreat. Gartner still sizes AI services at $1.25 trillion in 2030, but the growth belongs to indirect services, which compound at 34.5% and pass direct, consulting-led engagements in 2028. Direct AI services compound at 15.7%, less than half the indirect rate. Buyers are routing transformation budgets through software and cloud purchases instead of billable hours.

Three dates to plan against

2027 is the year chatbot spending tops out and agentic AI takes over inside enterprise software, which gives any vendor still selling assistant-branded features through the end of next year to ride what growth remains. By 2028, indirect services pass consulting-led engagements and infrastructure growth drops to 15%, so the buildout stops flattering everyone’s numbers. And 2030 arrives with $1.08 trillion of agentic software guarded by $16.4 billion of securing-AI spend. The first two dates decide where the money goes, and the third decides what happens when it arrives unprotected.

This post is my personal reflection on Gartner’s AI spending research from an industry analyst perspective. It does not represent my employer.

Source: Gartner, Forecast: AI Spending, Worldwide, 2025-2030, 2Q26, Kay Arnott, Jon Erensen, Amarendra, Adrian O’Connell, Arunasree Cheparthi, Naresh Singh, Peter Middleton, Hardeep Singh, Shailendra Upadhyay, Rishi Padhi, 24 July 2026, G00855896.

Apr 1

Gartner’s $246.2B Security Forecast shows 10 categories growing 2x to 3x the market

$30.6 billion in new security spending in a single year. Gartner's 1Q26 Information Security forecast projects $246.2 billion in 2026 spending across 41 categories. Cloud Security Posture Management leads at 33.4% growth, followed by Threat Intelligence at 27.3% and Cloud Access Security Brokers at 27.2%. Two legacy categories are declining. I analyzed the full dataset to rank the 10 fastest-growing categories by growth rate and what they mean for CISO budgets.

Read more

Feb 16

1 Comment

Gartner forecasts agentic AI will overtake chatbot spending by 2027

 

Agentic AI spending grows 141% in 2026 to $201.9 billion. By 2027, it will overtake chatbot and assistant spending for the first time. Then chatbot spending starts declining. I’ve tracked Gartner’s AI forecasts through multiple iterations. This crossover changes where security risk concentrates for every security professional reading this.

The crossover is in the segment-level data tables of Gartner’s Forecast: AI Spending, Worldwide, 2024–2029, 4Q25. The headline number is well known: $2.53 trillion in 2026, $4.7 trillion by 2029 at 33% CAGR. The segment breakdowns are not. Eight markets. Nineteen sub-segments. The sub-segment data tells a different story than the top line.

This is Gartner’s first dedicated AI spending forecast, and I’ve been waiting for it. Gartner states that comparisons to previous AI estimates are not meaningful because the scope widened, adding AI cybersecurity, agentic AI as a separate segment from chatbots, AI data technology, and expanded infrastructure coverage. Gartner writes, “This is the first iteration of the forecast on AI spending that Gartner has published. Gartner has significantly expanded and modified its AI forecast coverage. Spending comparisons to previous iterations are therefore not meaningful as the scope has widened. This includes both coverage of new markets and broadened definitions of the types of AI spending that are reflected in some market segments.”

Forrester’s Predictions 2026: Cybersecurity and Risk arrives at the same warning from a different angle: an agentic AI deployment will cause a publicly disclosed breach in 2026, leading to employee dismissals. Two firms. Same conclusion. The spending data explains why.

CAPTION: Total worldwide AI spending, 2024–2029. $1.14T to $4.71T. 33% CAGR. Growth decelerates from 54% (2025) to 16% (2029) as the base expands. Source: Gartner Forecast: AI Spending, 4Q25 (December 2025).

The full market breakdown

AI infrastructure dominates at $1.37 trillion, 54% of the total. AI software follows at $452.5 billion, growing 60% year-over-year. AI services add $588.6 billion. AI cybersecurity and AI data are the outliers: growing at 74% and 155% CAGR, respectively, rates that dwarf everything else in the forecast.

Source: Gartner Forecast: AI Spending, Worldwide, 2024–2029, 4Q25 (December 19, 2025). All figures in U.S. dollars. CAGR = 2024–2029. Gartner press release: https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2026-1-15-gartner-says-worldwide-ai-spending-will-total-2-point-5-trillion-dollars-in-2026

Infrastructure takes 54% of every AI dollar

AI-optimized servers alone account for $421.6 billion in 2026, growing to $699.7 billion by 2029. AI processing semiconductors add $289.4 billion. AI-optimized IaaS hits $38.3 billion at 71% CAGR, the fastest-growing infrastructure sub-segment. AI network fabric, a new category in this forecast, reaches $28.7 billion.

Infrastructure’s share drops from 54% to 48% by 2029 as software and services scale faster. The capital-intensive build-out phase is not over.

The agentic crossover nobody is planning for

Gartner now splits AI software into chatbots/assistants and agentic AI. The spending lines cross in 2027.

CAPTION: Agentic AI spending overtakes chatbot/assistant spending by 2027. Chatbots peak at $264.7B then decline. Agentic AI grows at 119% CAGR to $752.7B by 2029. Source: Gartner Forecast: AI Spending, 4Q25 (December 2025). AI Software segment, Table 1-2.

Source: Gartner Forecast: AI Spending, 4Q25 (December 2025). CAGR = 2024–2029.

Chatbots talk to people. Agents act on behalf of people. They access databases, execute transactions, chain multi-step workflows without human approval at each step. The attack surface has moved well beyond conversation windows. Agents are autonomous decision engines with production access.

Gartner’s Top Trends in Cybersecurity for 2026 lists agentic AI oversight as the number-one trend. Forrester’s Predictions 2026: Cybersecurity and Risk goes further: an agentic AI deployment will cause a public breach this year, and employees will lose their jobs for it. Forrester senior analyst Paddy Harrington calls it a “cascade of failures,” not a single point of error. Two analyst firms. Different methodologies. Same conclusion. Security strategies built for chatbot-era risk have a shelf life measured in quarters, not years.

AI cybersecurity is two markets, not one

Gartner created a dedicated AI cybersecurity market for the first time in this forecast. It nearly doubles in 2026. But the category name hides a structural split that matters more than the growth rate.

Source: Gartner Forecast: AI Spending, 4Q25 (December 2025). CAGR = 2024–2029.

Two sub-segments. Two very different problems.

AI-amplified security ($48.5 billion, 94.5% of the market) is what most enterprises mean when they say “AI cybersecurity.” This is AI working for your security team. Machine learning models that analyze network traffic patterns and flag anomalies faster than a human analyst can. Natural language processing that reads threat intelligence feeds and correlates indicators of compromise across millions of data points in seconds. Automated triage systems that prioritize which of the 11,000 daily alerts actually need a human response. AI-powered endpoint detection that identifies malware variants that signature-based tools miss. Behavioral analytics that learn what normal looks like for each user and flag deviations. Security orchestration platforms that automate incident response playbooks, reducing mean time to containment from hours to minutes.

This is the category where enterprises are spending aggressively. And for good reason. The math on analyst workloads demands it. Security operations centers are drowning in alerts, facing a persistent talent shortage, and defending attack surfaces that expand every quarter. AI-amplified tools address all three.

Securing AI ($2.8 billion, 5.5% of the market) is the other problem. AI-amplified security puts AI to work defending the enterprise. Securing AI reverses the relationship entirely — defending the AI itself. Protecting the models, the training data, the inference pipelines, the agent workflows, and the decision outputs that enterprises are deploying at $2.53 trillion in 2026. Prompt injection defenses. Model access controls. Training data poisoning detection. Output validation. Agent permission boundaries. Audit trails for autonomous decisions.

The distinction matters because they protect different things. AI-amplified security protects your enterprise using AI. Securing AI protects the AI itself. One is a tool. The other is the thing that needs protecting. Enterprises are investing 17 times more in the tool than in protecting the thing the tool runs on.

Shadow AI is not just employees using ChatGPT

Gartner names the mechanism driving AI software growth: vendor push. Software providers are integrating GenAI and agentic AI into existing product lines. AI software grows from $143 billion in 2024 to $981 billion by 2029 at 47% CAGR.

For CISOs, vendor push changes the equation. AI capabilities are being added to tools already in production. Often without explicit procurement decisions. The AI features embedded in your existing ERP, CRM, and developer platforms may already exceed what your security team has inventoried. Shadow AI is vendors activating AI inside products you already own.

The smallest market with the biggest growth rate

AI data technology: $134 million in 2024. $3.1 billion in 2026. $14.6 billion by 2029. The 155% CAGR is the highest in the forecast. The 277% year-over-year growth in 2026 is the steepest single-year jump of any segment.

Synthetic data generation is the standout sub-segment, going from $41 million to $6.8 billion by 2029. Gartner is direct: enterprises need AI-ready data with proper labeling, quality checks, and compliance. For organizations running AI projects on ungoverned data, the readiness gap compounds every quarter.

CAPTION: AI spending markets ranked by five-year CAGR. AI Data (155%) and AI Cybersecurity (74%) lead. AI Infrastructure is the largest by absolute dollars. Source: Gartner Forecast: AI Spending, 4Q25 (December 2025).

Indirect services are the governance blind spot

Indirect AI services, where AI is a supporting component in a larger project, grow from $78.4 billion in 2024 to $255.9 billion in 2026 at 50% CAGR. Direct AI services hit $332.8 billion. By 2028, indirect overtakes direct.

Indirect AI means capabilities embedded in consulting and implementation projects that procurement does not classify as AI. If you cannot see it in your AI inventory, you cannot govern it.

Servers are a bigger market than AI software

AI-optimized servers alone hit $421.6 billion in 2026, just below the entire AI software market at $452.5 billion. By 2029, servers reach $699.7 billion. Cloud providers are building capacity for AI workloads that have not materialized at scale. The infrastructure is ahead of the applications.

The enterprise agentic stack is showing up in spending data

Gartner’s DSML segment includes a dedicated agent builder platforms sub-segment at $5.0 billion in 2026, reaching $13.7 billion by 2029. AI observability and governance adds $1.3 billion, growing to $4.0 billion. The xOps sub-segment (MLOps, DataOps, ModelOps) is the largest at $15.0 billion.

Together, these form the tooling layer for building, monitoring, and governing agents in production. The enterprise agentic stack is materializing in the spending data. Most organizations have not formalized it in their architecture.

The numbers that belong in your next board deck

If you take one thing from this forecast into a budget meeting, take this table. I built it from the raw spreadsheet data. Six years of AI deployment spending next to AI security spending. The bottom row is the one that gets the questions.

Source: Gartner Forecast: AI Spending, 4Q25 (December 2025). All percentages derived from Gartner’s published data tables (Tables 1-1 and 1-2).

The ratio improves over time. Securing AI goes from 0.07% in 2024 to 0.25% by 2029. But watch the absolute numbers. In 2029, enterprises will spend $4.71 trillion deploying AI and $11.6 billion securing it. The percentage gets better. The dollar gap gets wider. Every year, the market grows its way into a larger exposure.

Where I think this lands

Three things worth tracking from the segment data:

The agentic crossover. Agentic AI overtakes chatbot spending in 2027. The enterprise risk profile shifts from conversational data leakage to autonomous decision-making at scale. CISOs who build agentic governance frameworks in 2026 position themselves before the inflection. The spending curve says the window is narrowing.

The securing-AI gap. $2.8 billion to protect AI systems in a year when $2.53 trillion deploys them. Enterprises are enthusiastic about using AI for defense. The investment in defending AI itself has not caught up.

Data readiness is the bottleneck. The 277% growth in AI data spending confirms that AI without governed data delivers diminished returns. Data classification investments directly enable or constrain AI ROI.

If your security budget is growing at 12% and AI deployment inside your enterprise is growing at 44%, the gap compounds every quarter. You cannot close it by holding steady. The organizations getting this right treat AI security as a proportion of AI deployment, not a fixed line item.

—

Sources

Gartner, Forecast: AI Spending, Worldwide, 2024–2029, 4Q25, December 19, 2025, ID G00843179.

Gartner press release (January 15, 2026): https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2026-1-15-gartner-says-worldwide-ai-spending-will-total-2-point-5-trillion-dollars-in-2026

Gartner, Top Trends in Cybersecurity for 2026 (February 5, 2026): https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2026-02-05-gartner-identifies-the-top-cybersecurity-trends-for-2026

Gartner, IT Spending Forecast 1Q26 (February 3, 2026): https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2026-02-03-gartner-forecasts-worldwide-it-spending-to-grow-10-point-8-percent-in-2026-totaling-6-point-15-trillion-dollars

Forrester, Predictions 2026: Cybersecurity and Risk (October 2025): https://www.forrester.com/blogs/predictions-2026-cybersecurity-and-risk/

All dollar figures in U.S. dollars. Growth rates and CAGR derived from Gartner’s published data tables (Tables 1-1 and 1-2).

Feb 10

Top 6 cybersecurity trends from Gartner’s 2026 Security Forecast

Over 57% of employees are using personal GenAI accounts for work. A third of them admit to uploading sensitive data into tools their security teams haven’t approved. Meanwhile, agentic AI is proliferating through no-code platforms and vibe coding, creating attack surfaces most CISOs can’t see, let alone govern. And quantum computing? No longer a 10-year planning horizon. It’s a 2030 action deadline.

Gartner’s Top Trends in Cybersecurity for 2026 report, released February 5, 2026, identifies six forces reshaping how CISOs must operate. These cut across governance, AI adoption, identity, workforce, and cryptographic strategy simultaneously. None of them is incremental.

The trends report lands alongside Gartner’s updated Forecast: Information Security, Worldwide, 2023–2029, 4Q25 (G00843183, December 18, 2025) and the Forecast Analysis: Information Security, Worldwide, 2026 (G00838442, February 5, 2026), which together project global information security spending reaching $244.2 billion in 2026, up 13.3% in current U.S. dollars. I’ve tracked this forecast through multiple quarterly updates. The trajectory keeps steepening. The six trends below explain where that money is going and why.

“Cybersecurity leaders are navigating uncharted territory this year as these forces converge, testing the limits of their teams in an environment defined by constant change,” said Alex Michaels, Director Analyst at Gartner. “This demands new approaches to cyber risk management, resilience, and resource allocation.”

The spending backdrop: $244 billion and accelerating

Before getting into the six trends, context matters. Gartner’s 4Q25 forecast shows the three major security segments all growing at double-digit constant currency rates in 2026:

Source: Gartner Forecast: Information Security, Worldwide, 2023–2029, 4Q25 Update (G00843183). Constant currency rates.

Cloud security remains the fastest-growing subsegment at 28.8% growth in 2026. Nothing else comes close. The combined cloud security market (cloud security posture management, cloud access security brokers, and cloud workload protection platforms) is projected to reach $32.4 billion by 2029, with a 25% CAGR in constant currency. I’ve been watching this subsegment accelerate for three quarters straight. CSPM alone is growing at a 31.30% CAGR.

 

Cloud security spending reaches $32.4 billion by 2029. CSPM leads at 31.30% CAGR. Source: Gartner 4Q25 Forecast. (Please click on the image to expand for easier reading)

Trend 1: Agentic AI demands cybersecurity oversight

This is the trend that touches everything else on this list. Employees and developers are deploying AI agents through no-code/low-code platforms and “vibe coding” at a pace that outstrips security governance. Unmanaged AI agent proliferation. Unsecured code. Compliance violations that most security teams don’t even have visibility into yet. That’s the picture Gartner is painting.

Gartner’s recommendation is blunt: cybersecurity leaders must identify both sanctioned and unsanctioned AI agents operating within their environments, enforce access controls and data guardrails, and develop incident response playbooks specific to agent-driven threats.

“While AI agents and automation tools are becoming increasingly accessible and practical for organizations to adopt, strategic cybersecurity planning for these technologies is essential,” said Michaels. Cybersecurity leaders must work cross-functionally to manage agentic AI adoption, identifying sanctioned and unsanctioned AI agents, enforcing data access controls, and developing incident response playbooks.

The spending data backs this up. Gartner’s 4Q25 forecast projects the AI-amplified security market reaching $160 billion by 2029, up from $49 billion in 2025. Gartner is clear that this isn’t additive spending. It represents the portion of existing security products that now embed AI capabilities. But the expectation tells the story: over 75% of enterprises will use AI-amplified cybersecurity products by 2028, up from less than 25% in 2025. Vendors that don’t embed AI will lose shelf space. (For more on AI security platforms, see Gartner’s Top Strategic Technology Trends for 2026, which predicts that over 50% of enterprises will use AI security platforms to protect their AI investments by 2028.)

Trend 2: Global regulatory volatility drives cyber resilience efforts

Regulators are getting personal. Boards and executives now face direct liability for compliance failures. Not just organizational fines, but individual accountability. The penalties for inaction have moved from theoretical to career-ending. Across multiple jurisdictions simultaneously.

Gartner advises cybersecurity leaders to formalize collaboration across legal, business, and procurement teams to establish clear accountability for cyber risk. Align control frameworks to recognized standards. Address data sovereignty concerns before they become enforcement actions. The organizations doing this well are treating regulatory preparedness as a core security function, not an annual compliance checkbox.

This is where the spending data gets interesting. Gartner’s forecast shows security consulting services growing from $24.2 billion (2024) to $36.6 billion (2029), adding $12.4 billion in five years. Security professional services follow a similar trajectory: $27.3 billion to $40.8 billion, adding $13.5 billion. Organizations are buying outside expertise because they can’t build regulatory competence fast enough in-house. I’ve been covering these numbers for three quarters, and the services growth is the part of the forecast that keeps surprising me.

Infrastructure protection adds $26.4 billion between 2024 and 2029, the largest absolute growth of any subsegment. Source: Gartner 4Q25 Forecast. (Please click on the image to expand for easier reading)

Trend 3: Post-quantum computing moves into action plans

Gartner predicts advances in quantum computing will render the asymmetric cryptography that organizations rely on unsafe by 2030. Four years. That’s the window to adopt post-quantum cryptography alternatives before “harvest now, decrypt later” attacks start cashing in on data that adversaries are collecting today.

Organizations need to identify their cryptographic deployments, assess data sensitivity and lifespan, and prioritize cryptographic agility. That last phrase keeps coming up in my conversations with CISOs. The ability to swap encryption methods without re-architecting entire systems. Swapping an algorithm is one thing. Doing it across a production environment without downtime is an entirely different problem.

“Post-quantum cryptography is reshaping cybersecurity strategies by prompting organizations to identify, manage, and replace traditional encryption methods, while prioritizing cryptographic agility,” said Michaels. “By investing in these capabilities and prioritizing migration now, assets will be secured when quantum threats become a reality.“

The encryption market in Gartner’s 4Q25 forecast grows from $1.04 billion in 2023 to $2.04 billion by 2029 at an 11.95% CAGR. A 2.0x increase. For what has historically been one of the slower-growing security subsegments, that’s a significant acceleration. Quantum urgency is changing the math.

Trend 4: Identity and access management adapts to AI agents

AI agents are breaking traditional IAM models. Plain and simple. Identity registration and governance, credential automation, and policy-driven authorization weren’t designed for autonomous machine actors that can initiate actions, access data, and interact with systems without human intervention. The scale problem compounds fast: when every employee can deploy dozens of AI agents, the identity surface area explodes.

Gartner recommends a targeted, risk-based approach. Invest where gaps and risks are greatest. Leverage automation where possible. The practical starting point is understanding which AI agents carry the most privilege and the least oversight. Those are your highest-risk identities right now, and most organizations haven’t inventoried them.

The identity market is already significant. Gartner’s 4Q25 forecast shows identity access management growing from $18.7 billion (2024) to $29.0 billion (2029), adding $10.3 billion in five years. That’s before the full scale of agentic AI identity requirements hits the market. IAM vendors that solve machine-actor identity at scale will capture a disproportionate share of that $10.3 billion growth.

Trend 5: AI-driven SOC solutions destabilize operational norms

AI-enabled security operations centers are enhancing alert triage and investigation workflows. The technology works. But deploying AI into a SOC doesn’t automatically reduce headcount needs. It changes the skill mix. Analysts who excelled at manual triage need different capabilities to oversee AI-driven workflows. Organizations are discovering this the hard way. That’s an organizational transformation challenge, and throwing more technology at it doesn’t help.

“To realize the full potential of AI in security operations, cybersecurity leaders must prioritize people as much as technology,” said Michaels. “Strengthening workforce capabilities, implementing human-in-the-loop frameworks into AI-supported processes and aligning adoption with clear strategic objectives will be critical to maintaining resilience as SOCs evolve.”

The talent dimension makes this harder than it already sounds. ISC2’s 2024 Cybersecurity Workforce Study, published in October 2024, documented a global workforce gap of 4.8 million professionals, a 19% year-over-year increase. The active workforce flatlined at 5.5 million (up just 0.1%). The numbers are brutal: 25% of organizations reported cybersecurity layoffs in 2024. 37% faced budget cuts. 90% report skills shortages. 58% believe the shortage puts their organization at significant risk. On the spending side, managed security services are growing at 11.1% in 2026, the fastest rate in the services segment. Organizations can’t hire fast enough, so they’re buying managed SOC capacity instead.

Trend 6: GenAI breaks traditional cybersecurity awareness tactics

Existing security awareness programs are failing. Full stop. A Gartner survey of 175 employees conducted between May and November 2025 found that 57% use personal GenAI accounts for work purposes, while 33% admit to uploading sensitive information to tools their organizations haven’t sanctioned. Those numbers should alarm every CISO reading this. A third of your workforce is actively feeding proprietary data into tools you can’t audit.

Gartner recommends shifting from general awareness training to adaptive behavioral programs that include AI-specific tasks. Generic compliance videos won’t cut it here. The organizations getting this right are making approved GenAI tools easy to access and unsanctioned tools hard to justify. Trying to ban GenAI outright just drives usage underground and costs you talent.

Strengthening governance, embedding secure practices, and establishing clear policies for authorized GenAI use will reduce exposure to privacy breaches and intellectual property loss. The governance gap on GenAI usage is, in my view, the most underestimated risk on this entire list. Every other trend has a spending line item attached to it. This one requires behavioral change, which is harder to buy.

Total market trajectory: $173.5 billion to $323.5 billion

Gartner’s year-by-year spending trajectory shows the acceleration curve these six trends are riding:

Source: Gartner Forecast: Information Security, Worldwide, 2023–2029, 4Q25 Update (G00843183, December 18, 2025). Current U.S. dollars.

 

CSPM and CASB lead all security categories with 31% and 26% CAGR through 2029. Source: Gartner 4Q25 Forecast. (Please click on the image to expand for easier reading)

What this means for CISOs

Three of the six trends (agentic AI oversight, IAM for machine actors, and GenAI awareness) are fundamentally about the same problem: autonomous AI systems operating inside enterprise environments without adequate governance. The other three (regulatory volatility, post-quantum readiness, and AI-driven SOCs) are the structural forces those governance failures will collide with. That convergence is the signal about where 2026 budgets need to go.

The organizations that will navigate this environment successfully are doing three things simultaneously:

Mapping their AI agent footprint now. If you don’t know how many AI agents are operating across your environment, sanctioned and unsanctioned, you can’t govern what you can’t see. Gartner’s 75% AI-amplified product adoption projection by 2028 means this window for establishing control is narrow.

Building cryptographic agility into their architecture. The 2030 quantum deadline means migration planning starts in 2026, not 2028. The encryption market’s 2.0x growth reflects early movers. Late movers face rip-and-replace costs that compound every quarter they wait.

Investing in people alongside AI tooling. AI-enabled SOCs work when human operators have the skills to oversee them. The ISC2 data is unambiguous: a 4.8 million professional gap growing at 19% year-over-year. Managed security services growth at 11.1% tells you where CISOs are finding capacity.

Gartner’s numbers aren’t projections anymore. They’re procurement trends already hitting finance systems. The $244.2 billion flowing into information security this year will fund agentic AI governance, quantum migration, and SOC transformation, whether your organization participates or not.

Bottom line: CISOs planning for 2027 are watching their competitors buy the tools they’ll be scrambling for in 18 months. The data says move now.

Dec 30

1 Comment

AI Security market 2025 funding data, top startups, and the ServiceNow factor

ServiceNow dropped $11.6 billion on security acquisitions in 2025 alone. Armis for $7.75 billion. Moveworks for $2.85 billion. Veza for roughly $1 billion. In 2025, just one company, ServiceNow, spent more on acquiring security startups than 175 startups raised in two years. Meanwhile, the entire AI security startup ecosystem raised $8.5 billion across 175 companies over 24 months. That single data point should reshape how security leaders think about vendor consolidation and how AI builders think about their exit paths.

I analyzed Crunchbase data covering every AI security startup that raised Series A, B, or C funding between January 2024 and December 2025. The patterns are striking.

The acceleration is real

Q1 2024: $274 million across 8 deals. Q4 2025: $2.17 billion across 28 deals. That’s 8x growth in quarterly funding over two years.

The full-year numbers tell the story more clearly. 2024 saw $2.16 billion in total funding. 2025 hit $6.34 billion, nearly tripling. Average deal sizes jumped from $34 million to $54 million. This isn’t a gentle upward trend. The market is restructuring in real time.

Where the money flows

Network and Zero Trust infrastructure captured $1.9 billion across 44 companies. Tailscale‘s $161 million Series C reflects what enterprises already know. VPN architectures are dying. Identity-based access is replacing them.

Threat Detection and SOC automation drew $1.2 billion across 28 companies. 7AI‘s $130 million Series A stands out as one of the largest A funding rounds in this category. The bet: AI agents can handle the full security operations lifecycle at a scale human analysts cannot match.

Identity and Access Management pulled $990 million. But here’s what matters: that money went to just 6 companies. Saviynt‘s $700 million Series B dominates the category. When one company captures 71% of a category’s funding at Series B, investors see platform consolidation ahead. ServiceNow’s Veza acquisition, three weeks later, validated that thesis.

Insights into deal sizes

Median tells a different story from average deal sizes. Series A median: $20 million. Series A average: $28 million. The gap widens at later stages. Series C median: $85 million. Series C average: $119 million.

Translation: mega-deals skew the data significantly. Eighteen companies raised $100 million or more. Those 18 deals represent 10% of companies but 40% of total funding. For every Saviynt raising $700 million, dozens of startups are raising $15-25 million Series A rounds.

The AI/LLM security gap

Only 13 companies focus specifically on securing AI systems, LLMs, and agentic applications. Total funding: $414 million. That’s less than 5% of the $8.5 billion total. For context: ServiceNow paid more for Veza alone than the entire AI/LLM security category raised in two years.

The players building in this space:

• Noma Security ($100M, Series B). Unified AI and agent security platform.

• Credo AI ($21M, Series B). AI governance and compliance automation.

• Lakera ($20M, Series A). Real-time GenAI security against LLM vulnerabilities.

• Prompt Security ($18M, Series A). Enterprise generative AI adoption platform.

• GetReal Security ($17.5M, Series A). Deepfake and AI-generated impersonation defense.

• Jericho Security ($15M, Series A). Training against generative AI-powered attacks.

Enterprises are deploying AI systems at unprecedented rates. Shadow AI breaches cost $4.63 million per incident. That’s $670,000 more than standard breaches, according to IBM’s 2025 Cost of a Data Breach Report. Model Context Protocol vulnerabilities. Prompt injection attacks. Data exfiltration through AI assistants. The attack surface expands while protection lags.

Either these 13 companies scale rapidly, established players acquire their way into the space, or CISOs face a protection gap without commercial solutions.

How spending breaks out geographically

The U.S. captured $6.1 billion across 119 companies. That’s 71% of total funding. Israel remains the second hub: 15 companies, $738 million. Germany, the UK, and Canada trail with single-digit percentages.

Within the U.S., California dominates: $2.7 billion across 62 companies. That’s more than all non-U.S. markets combined ($2.4 billion). Texas ($865M), New York ($667M), and Colorado ($295M) round out the top states.

The concentration creates vendor risk. Regulatory fragmentation between the U.S. and EU markets. Geopolitical tensions affecting Israeli companies. Single-region dependency in security infrastructure. These are fundamental considerations for enterprise security architects.

ServiceNow’s acquisitions signal large-scale consolidation

ServiceNow’s 2025 acquisition spree warrants its own analysis. Armis brings cyber-physical security and OT/IoT visibility. Moveworks adds agentic AI capabilities. Veza delivers identity security for the AI era. The company calls it an “AI control tower.” A unified security stack that sees, decides, and acts across the entire technology footprint.

The driver: ServiceNow’s Security and Risk business crossed $1 billion in annual contract value in Q3 2025. They expect Armis alone to triple their market opportunity. When a platform vendor invests $11.6 billion in its own security workflows, point solutions become acquisition targets or competitors.

What this means for 2026

For security leaders: Map your vendor portfolio against both funding momentum and M&A activity. Startups with strong backing will survive consolidation. Others won’t. Audit your AI deployment pipeline against available protections. The gap between AI adoption and AI security is widening. Accelerate zero-trust adoption while solutions mature.

For AI builders: Security isn’t a feature to add later. The $414 million flowing into AI/LLM security represents smart money recognizing that unprotected AI systems are enterprise liabilities. Build with guardrails or build vulnerabilities.

Analysis based on Crunchbase data covering 175 AI security startups that raised Series A, B, or C funding between January 2024 and December 2025. ServiceNow acquisition data from the company’s press releases dated December 2025.